Many Conservatives Don't Want to Attack Obama Supporters

Ok, It's hard for me to imagine that people don't see this perspective, but I do feel maybe a lot of people simply don't get a chance to really think about it. Now hear me out on this... this is not like your typical right wing perspective, although, at least on the surface for some people, it will possible appear so. This is not a racist rant. This is not a personal attack. This is not hatred for liberals or democrats. This is not an attack on people who are in need or want to help poor.

Now you're simply going to have to hear this out! What this is is an attack on the global elite top perhaps around .01 percent who it is highly rumored have plans to construct the world in a way that is safe for them and their families but that put everyone else into a sort of 'confinement' or slavery if you will.

These people may stop at nothing to fool you. They will surely put out all kinds of fake politicians... like George Bush... the fake conservative who expanded the hell out of big government in general on a large scale. 

How about Obama? Can we really call him a liberal in any real sense of the word? Has he genuinely helped the 'poor'? Now don't just think I'm asking this because I hate the 'left' or something. This is an independent perspective. Let's just look for the truth regardless of our preexisting bias!

Think about it like this for just a minute...regardless of how you feel... just keep an open mind!

Obama doesn't challenge or hold Bush accountable for anything in any real way. Obama is a free ride for Bush.

Obama is related to Bush and overall, Obama mostly votes just like Bush. They both support or certainly aren't opposed to much of our foreign policy expansion and invasion, the activities of the NSA, the TSA and the DEA, with some exception. Overall, Obama might as well be George Bush. In order to support Obama, one has to assume the Bush told them the truth about everything. Obama apparently spends your money covering up Bush war crimes. You have Google...   Do the research!

Obama has done NOTHING highly different from Bush. Also, Obama certainly has nothing to do with challenging 9/11 or any of these questions in any way whatsoever.
If you raise questions, the mainstream headline response is that you're a 'conspiracy theorist' or a 'racist', when in reality, you're just a physicist....   and you have simple questions that are simply not being answered or adding up. You are the 'bad guy'...which seems awkward, but since Obama has been the new face of big government in the US, you can't really speak out without those labels being hurled at you.

After 8 years of the atrocious state expansionist and potentially highly criminal Bush. It would seem that naive drinkers of whatever politicians spew somehow think that Obama is an 'outsider' or a newcomer or the 'first black President' when in reality, Obama is an agent of corporate finance capital and he was put in there to cover up everything Bush started.

Obama works for same group of globalists as Bush... they are both members of the CFR. They both supported TARP banker and speculator bailouts and even GM bailouts I believe. Do your own research!

They both are overall pro Patriot Act, Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, education industrial complex inflation to a trillion dollars in debt, the bloated military industrial complex, corporate subsidies to big bankers and corporations, with some of YOUR MONEY!

Then Obama comes up in here and seemingly straight up lies about NDAA and seems to act as a phony demagogue with gay rights and women and a number of trivial emotional appeal that perhaps he feels he can try to get in on. And then the uncongressional military and drone strikes.... well.... let's just say...many of us wanted to get rid of Bush...not reelect him for another 8 years...but that's what we got with Obama...8 more years of Bush, with a Muslim spin or whatever.

Obama's doing nothing to contract and restrict the big government. He's not really an outsider, he's like a recently groomed/hired economic hit man with a pretty face if you will. He's expanding state spending in many ways creating bureaucracy and chasing away real capital.

He's just like Bush with a different skin color and letter next to his name... he talks liberal speak just like Bush talked conservative speak as a candidate....but Obama is not a social liberal... he's a corporate liberal... he's supplies subsidies and welfare to corporations..just like Bush. Obama and Romey both voted for TARP to bail out the same corporations who would fund both of their campaigns. Do your research!

If you question and research the events of 9/11 like you should... then you definitely can't support Obama... he's just a sleeping dog and perhaps...he's definitely lying!!

Maybe he's a constant liar to many of us. It's seemingly pathetic the way people drink up the lies and BS he appears to spout, and maybe I'm somehow wrong, I don't claim to know absolutely. Just saying how it appears. It's like... not even funny... however the point here is not to attack Obama supporters or make them feel belittled... because many of us were hoping to find a solution to the problems of big tyrannical government that Bush was imposing upon us.

We are definitely not getting a solution with Obama. He appointed the corporate executives from Monsanto, Mars Candy, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and many others to the Federal Government. This is fascism. It's hard enough to get corporations to regulate themselves. Should we be allowing corporations to regulate society external to themselves, through the state? Absolutely not!

I'm not saying to believe every single thing, but use your own judgement, use Google and Youtube and other independently searchable sources to research the facts for yourself.

Use keyword search variations to see if any of this is really true. Take your time. This is our country, our lives... our freedom! Do you want to live in a corporate Matrix? Of course not! Let's make sure everyone understands statism.

Obama is now in the process of expanding the drone program. Robots that kill! Are robots supposed to kill? Maybe in a corporate matrix... but not in a free society abiding by the non aggression principle and the right to life! Do you want to live in a free, open and diverse society or a monolithic, fully democratic society where everyone is falsely made 'equal' and all this and that largely to quench the emotional outcries more so than actual need in many cases?

Listen... Obama, once again, is an agent of corporate finance capital just like Bush. So shouldn't he and really both of them and all their cronies be held accountable?

Shouldn't Obama be held accountable to his constituents for making his own supporters seem naive by simply doing the opposite of nearly everything he claims to stand for in his speeches?

Does he have of the real qualities whatsoever of a real 'black' leader?

Would MLK Jr be proud of Obama with his unauthorized drone strikes and NDAA legislation? Let's face it... probably not even close! Share your thoughts and share me please!

Would you step into the 'Gun Free' zone knowing this?

The 'Gun Free' zone and why it's so dangerous

Look...we are simply never going to completely eliminate aggression and use of force and it will manifest itself in many different ways. People die in car accidents everyday due to the use of the automobile. The same happens with all kinds of heavy equipment or machinery. Machinery is dangerous. Nature is dangerous. Life is dangerous. A gun is meant to be a tool for defense. Certainly it can be used aggressively even if only to induce fear...but then, so can a machete.

Now the main point to having arms in the population is so that we can resist socioeconomic tyranny or invasion, so let us not forget how important that is when we think about the secession from British monarchy!

It is also meant as a means to defend against home invasion or personal aggression.
But the main thing it is meant for is so that we can protect ourselves from tyrannical politicians that want to come in and sell their policies to a majority of ideologues and largely entitlement oriented folks to create a mob rule scenario. So let us not forget that the main reason we have any freedom to even express any ideas or grievances whatsoever with government is because we are heavily armed.
As far as 'Gun Free' zones, the problem is that we can never assume that guns will be completely eliminated and so we must always be vigilant towards lunatics and criminals who might get a hold of guns as they often do. The only way to properly defend against these kinds of violent and potentially fatal crimes is to have a gun for defense.

In the massacres we have seen where students and even small children are being shot and killed by lunatics, we have noticed the startling trend of 'Gun Free' zones. It's not to say that students should be carrying weapons all over the campus, but surely they are inviting a criminal or lunatic with a gun who may want to attack in a fanatical mode since the 'Gun Free' zone is essentially announcing that there is no reasonable means of defense legally available and there probably isn't if good, law abiding people are 'following the law'.

Could this make any less sense? Let's end the 'Gun Free' zones. If an authorized gun owner happens to be in the facility, it's probably a good thing in actuality. Think about it...  would you rather have one lunatic with a gun and no good guys with a gun or one lunatic with a gun and nine good guys with a gun. Now you may say you want nobody to have a gun... but seriously... let's be realistic, criminals will always find ways to get guns, just like they currently find plenty of ways to get cocaine and other drugs. Let's not be naive. Law abiding citizens need to have access to reasonable means of defense and any infringement upon the second or first amendment is potentially VERY dangerous. In fact, it's so dangerous that you should probably be waking up all Americans to this information so that they have a full understanding of why 'Gun Free' zones are very dangerous. 

Now if all these massacres are happening in 'Gun Free' zones...can we agree that a 'Gun Free' America don't sound so good in that light? Look... Hitler and Chairman Mao imposed gun controls. Stalin imposed gun control legislation and it turned out to be a very bad idea. Any time you disarm a large population of people in any real way, they are at great risk of even extermination. Do you ever want to risk being exterminated by a monolithic state government old r invader from the outside? Absolutely not!! So you want to protect that Second Amendment and you want to make sure your friends and family understand these are very real reasons to stand up for their US Constitution.

The free market is not perfect and this doesn't mean we should go hard right wing and talk about police, gun or military mandates, but we should be talking about the ethical use of a firearm from the perspective of a conservationist patriot. Once who preserves their rights to defend themselves and their home and their family and in terms of hunting, it also conserves the environment against mass ranching productions and processing plants. It puts the responsibility back into the hands of the individual and also holds those individuals accountable for their own actions.

End the 'gun free' zones and makes sure people understand lawful self defense. Think of how many lives would possibly have been saved is there was a possibility of meaningful and effective self defense within the vicinity. Even just one han
dgun could have potentially saved most of these lives. A gun is the only way you're gonna stop someone else with a gun...let's not be naive here. Don't allow demagoguery to rule... let our hearts go out to the victims of this completely fraudulent event today... at the same time, do your research, I think you will find that there are more questions than answers. Don't let them use this as an excuse to infringe upon the second amendment.

Ultimately, someone with a gun is called to the scene for self defense... the only thing that allowed this massacre to happen was the fact that law abiding citizens were not able to be armed. Does this mean it would have definitely worked? No... does it mean that everyone should have a gun? No... it means that whether a person is invading with a gun or a simply machete.... if that person is a lunatic or if there is a mob or a senseless riot, a law abiding citizen needs to have a reasonable defense and a gun is a mechanism for that! Do I encourage gun ownership and usage... ? Well I would want at least some of my countrymen and women to know how to use one...even if I didn't use them... and I really don't...but the simple fact is.... in order for a population to assure freedom, they must remain vigilant and armed. Don't let tyrants rule...don't allow the government to lie to you, to use you or to play off of your emotions. Do your research and read the US Constitution!

Free Market Capitalism vs Centralized Controls and Regulations

The economy is a rain forest. The capitalist believes it should thrive. If you let it thrive with minimal to no pruning, all trees won't be the same height and there won't be 'economic equality' perhaps...and some of the shorter trees will surely not be able to survive as well as the taller trees...but overall, the shortest trees will be supported in many ways by those taller trees by way of ecosystem... and are still taller than the tallest tree in a freshly deforested area!

Real, free market capitalism creates massive prosperity, diversity, rapid economic growth, vegetation, flowering, unregulated growth... which isn't perfect, but it's better than mowing the whole forest down like a communist/fascist and giving all the fruits of the harvest over to a bureaucratic group of ideological social engineers and 'gardeners' who think they can put us all in a straight line and determine on a monolithic, global scale what is right and wrong. Humans weren't meant to live in straight lines. Humans weren't created to live in the Matrix...people are meant to live and die naturally without intervention and without destroying ourselves. At least that's how I see it!

Don't allow your fascist, corrupt government to ever mow us down. Read your US Constitution and become a member of the information revolution so that humankind goes on in the direction of more prosperity, liberty and voluntarism for all global citizens. Your only obligation to someone is to respect their life, liberty and right to keep the fruits of their own labor. Set an example of leadership and thrive. Not self pity and are greater than that. You are the one that people look up to.

Be that tall tree that helps to pull those smaller trees up and let's reach the sunlight together!

Subscribe to this blog by entering your email address and share with a friend to educate them on the free and open market. Restore liberty!

A Place Where Guns Are Controlled

There's a place where guns are globally and centrally controlled, everyone gets free housing, healthcare, food, education, no fights or conflicts, drone strikes without congressional vote, indefinite detention for us citizens, no freedom of speech or thought.

This place can be seen when we take the blue pill if you've ever seen the matrix. I am for social and economic diversity, competition, var
iation, non cookie cutter, non centralized, non artificial freedom with mostly diverse local economies and societies...what should a government be doing for us other that simply protecting our life and our rights to personal liberty short of anything thing demonstrated to take away from the life and liberty of another?

It all depends on what role you believe a big central government plays in our lives..... do we have tribe leaders and local elders to learn from.... or is globally centralized big brother gonna play mom and dad? Should the majority rule the minority...? To what degree should we allow ourselves to force the subsidizing of failure... specifically for corporations... like the billions that we know go to BofA, big oil, pharma etc... who's the big centralized government to decide how your capital should be invested?

Anyone who thinks it's a good idea to disarm a large population of people is certainly not thinking about history. Disarmed populations get slaughtered. Think Sudan or Uganda or the Old Soviet Union. I have to wonder what history some people have read. Are we to expect that a simple law is going to get the guns out of anyone's hands other than the law abiding citizens?! Sure it might stiffen some that the state can confiscate more of the people's property and impose fines and just do whatever they want...because you'll be at a major disadvantage. 

You can't rebel against currency devaluation. it goes back hundreds if not thousands of years... look at the economy. Look at NDAA indefinite detention for US citizens and then this UN Gun Ban Treaty....? The question is whether you want to live in a free country or if you want to be bound to the slavery incurred by currency devaluation! End the Federal Reserve which bails out corporations with your money behind your back... realize which politicians are addressing the Federal Reserve and which aren't and then you will know who to support and who to oppose!

Gun Control Demagoguery

It's real simple. When a person purchases a gun, it's just like any piece of hardware or tool or mechanism of potential force...accidents happen! Does that mean we ban certain kinds of cars... NO .... it means that car manufactures compete for safety and a free market holds them accountable using their dollar in a free and open market. Is the free market perfect? No.... is government perfect? Let's watch this short clip and see if we can answer that question!


Listen Idiot, Here's Why You Should Not Have the Right to Own Guns

Well... let's see why you would not have the right to bear arms? And it has nothing to do with political parties!

1. First of all... for your own good and of course that of others, if you are not an abider of the natural or god given laws of reciprocation and the fundamental Golden Rule that says we shall treat our neighbor as we shall treat ourselves regardless of their external differences, then having a gun is simply not smart. We should respect each other as we would respect ourselves. That we shall respect the life and liberty of another human being. Also, if you have a history of aggressive or violent behavior and deemed a hazard by your local community, then in these cases you don't want or should not be allowed to purchase or generally own a firearm.

2. You would also not have the right to bear arms... if you were say one of as many as 13 million Jews exterminated in Nazi Germany... then yeah... you would have to register and/or turn in your guns... to Hitler's SS Commanders.

3. If you were one of 1.5 million Armenians in Turkey from 1915-1917 who were unable to defend themselves and were simply exterminated... you probably wouldn't have the right to bear arms!

4. If you were under the dictatorship of say Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao or any one of a number of a tyrants, then you would not have a right to own a gun and therefore, your community would be utterly defenseless against invasion and/or extermination by a militia with more firepower, perhaps even a domestic traitor militia group.

5. If you live in Australia since as far back as about 2001, you would likely not own a firearm... where violent crimes, homicides, assaults, rapes and home invasions are significantly higher than previously by up to 300%.

6. You might not want a gun if being exterminated en masse by a foreign or domestic enemy don't bother you...or maybe you think that we live in a Utopia where nothing like Nazi Germany will ever happen again.

7. You might not be able to get to a gun or be able to use a gun if are detained against your own will and labeled as a 'terrorist' as a result of say the new NDAA legislation that has been passed through the house and senate and even signed by the President giving your own Federal government the codified right to detain and imprison and perhaps even torture you indefinitely without a trial in front of a jury of your peers. In other words, draconian, tyrannical, uncongressional dictatorship.

8. Also, you might not have easy access to a gun in a society where currency is inflating and the big, centralized government is utilizing a big, centralized banking system as a means for subsidizing their closest allies in the private sector who help to get them reelected each cycle.

9. Guns will be harder to get as the currency inflates and it is sensed that there will be riots and rebellion. The government factions may attempt to get as many guns out of the hands of anyone and everyone other than themselves and especially out of the hands of the law abiding, middle class citizen that has to work hard for their money and sees much of it going to pay for things he/she never would think of agreeing to, like war, wasteful government research programs, corporate subsidies and bailouts, excessive student, housing, auto and other easy money loans.... in this society where petroleum is approaching $5 a gallon and there are less of the jobs that people are trained for and used to... then your gun rights will be taken away...because you are useless to the bottom line of the corporation called big government.

10. Now certainly when a rapist or home invader is looking for someone to infringe upon... we can surely guess whether they want you to have the right to bear arms or not. A mugger or someone following you in your car down a long road at night...surely they wouldn't want you to be a gun owner. Maybe the gangs and criminals in Chicago might not want a resident to be armed and trained. Carjackers, thieves, jealous psychopaths... they don't want you to know how to use a they?!

11. Heck... I don't know... you shouldn't have a gun...because of these tragic incidents at schools and other 'gun free' zones...    but then again, with the recent UN Gun Ban Treaty that has been in the works for some time, I guess it all just depends on whether or not you believe that your own government would kill a few children to advance their own political agenda or not...  let's watch this short clip with Barbara Walters and Madeleine Albright and then answer that question.

Remember the Bush years?

Or this speech by the current President

Look... this isn't about political party anymore.. it isn't just isn't just democrats... it's both !! It's us against the system!

12. Who doesn't want you to have a gun? Someone who is afraid of you... and why are they afraid of you? Because they have done or plan to do something wrong to you! The big tyrannical government.... doesn't want you to have a gun!!! Wake up America!!!

It doesn't matter what your political beliefs or opinions are, this is just history 101!
Let's listen to this message and tell your friends to do the same...restore liberty for all!